Forum Replies Created
User (Old forums)MemberSeptember 13, 2003 at 5:37 pmPost count: 23064
<b>Performance<b/> should be the top priority.
The abstract file system that you built into 1.0 is outstanding. That’s why I bought the suite. I’m now treating a Zip file as a small, secure file system. The performance is “challenging” however. I hope, and trust that this will be resolved with 2.0. I can’t wait for your new http://FTP.net component to include the same abstract file system.
The custom headers feature sounds great. Adding the ability to add custom metadata to the abstract file system will rock!
Hmmm…. sounds a bit like Longhorn + Yukon = WinFS
Imported from legacy forums. Posted by TomG (had 1344 views)User (Old forums)MemberSeptember 13, 2003 at 2:15 pmPost count: 23064
Indeed the installer will ask you to unistall previous versions however, you can simply backup the Xceed.dll files (XceedZip.dll, XceedCry.dll etc) and use Regsvr32 “path of the dll” to register the dll or, Regsvr32 -u “path of the dll”. If you are working with our .Net components then the procedure might be a little more touchy. If this is the case, please send me an email at email@example.com with the detailed product you wish to backup/update. Unfortunately our support is not open until Monday morning.
As for your second question, if you update to a more recent version, it should work right away.
Cheers ! (h)
Imported from legacy forums. Posted by Matt (had 757 views)User (Old forums)MemberSeptember 12, 2003 at 8:35 pmPost count: 23064
One more thing i’d like to is the ControlViewer to behave the same way on InsertionRows and DataRows. Currently, the ControlViewer will only paint on InsertionRows if there is an underlying DataRow attached(when the InsertionRow is being edited).
Imported from legacy forums. Posted by Louis (had 884 views)User (Old forums)MemberSeptember 12, 2003 at 1:06 pmPost count: 23064User (Old forums)MemberSeptember 11, 2003 at 7:13 pmPost count: 23064User (Old forums)MemberSeptember 11, 2003 at 3:22 pmPost count: 23064
Would you be able to visit our Upate Center http://www.xceedsoft.com/download/updates.htm) and make sure you have the latest version of the XceedFTP? Since 1.1.111 many issues with the library have been resolved. Furthermore, upon closing the application it would be a good idea to make sure you are no longer connected on the server, the proper way to do this is by setting the Abort property to true and by calling the disconnect method:
XceedFtp1.Abort = true
If this is still not working and wish to reach me directly, email me at : <a href=”mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org”>email@example.com</a>.
Cheers ! (h)
Imported from legacy forums. Posted by Matt (had 685 views)User (Old forums)MemberSeptember 11, 2003 at 1:00 pmPost count: 23064
Indeed this will work. However, if you want to fake a maximized window, you will have to resize the child form accordingly to the parent form’s dimensions.
Setting the child form’s .WindowState property to Maximized would make the ControlBox reappear along with the Title-Bar of the Mdi-Client.
Imported from legacy forums. Posted by PL (had 545 views)User (Old forums)MemberSeptember 11, 2003 at 11:27 amPost count: 23064
I have found a work-around for this problem.
Form1 form1 = new Form1();
form1.MdiParent = this;
form1.Menu = null;
form1.ControlBox = false;
form1.Text = “”;
form1.Dock = DockStyle.Fill;
form1.WindowState = FormWindowState.Normal;
will remove the Title-bar on the Mdi-Client completly.
Imported from legacy forums. Posted by C# (had 430 views)User (Old forums)MemberSeptember 11, 2003 at 9:52 amPost count: 23064User (Old forums)MemberSeptember 10, 2003 at 1:38 pmPost count: 23064
This is a reported bug. It has been corrected in the latest update of Xceed Smart UI for .NET. This update should be available later this week. You will be able to download it from our update center availabe at : <a href=”http://www.xceedsoft.com/download/updates.htm”>http://www.xceedsoft.com/download/updates.htm</a>
Imported from legacy forums. Posted by PL (had 4186 views)User (Old forums)MemberSeptember 9, 2003 at 5:31 pmPost count: 23064User (Old forums)MemberSeptember 9, 2003 at 5:22 pmPost count: 23064
Xceed Zip Compression Library 5.0 uses a different naming convention from PkZip and WinZip when splitting Zip files in a single location. I realize that Xceed created their naming convention before PkZip and WinZip had the split functionality, but my customers want compatibility.
Could you at least offer the option to follow the PkZip and WinZip naming convention when writing a zip file and make sure that Xceed can read split zips created by PkZip and WinZip
Imported from legacy forums. Posted by rsargent (had 555 views)User (Old forums)MemberSeptember 9, 2003 at 10:38 amPost count: 23064User (Old forums)MemberSeptember 9, 2003 at 10:23 amPost count: 23064
One of the main reasons I choose to use SmartUI is the XP “emulation”. Very cool feature since the majority of our user base isn’t using XP.
In order of personal priority…
Tab Control — tabs at top, left, right and bottom; XP “emulation” when a tab is selected/highlighted.
Button — XP “emulation” to get that soft orange glow. 🙂
Combo Box — A competitor, SharpLibary.com, offers a great array of combo box options. Font DropDown, Color DropDown, Checkbox Dropdown, “My Computer” with Drives Dropdown. The reason I’m not using their product is no 98/ME support.
Like previous poster…. Free form placement of option controls, again with XP look.
I’d like a tool that could recreate the main portion of the XP Control Panel. At the top of the control you have an icon and description… Then “Pick a task…” with several task options… Then below that a place to put several “large” icons in row going across.
Imported from legacy forums. Posted by mxp (had 492 views)